Does the molecular weight of the polymer change the limit of congruency (LoC) of an ASD, and what mechanism ends congruent release?
Yes, strongly. The LoC was below 5% DL with PVP K12 and K17, 20% with K25 and about 33, 35 and 38% with K29/32, K60 and K90. With the short chains the drug-rich droplets agglomerated in the gel layer (Failure Mode I); with long chains release failed only near phase inversion, seen between 30 and 40% DL. ····
For clotrimazole with six PVP grades in pH 8.0 buffer at 37 °C, the LoC (highest loading releasing more than 80% of the drug) rose with PVP molecular weight, from below 5% for K12 and K17 to over 30% for K29/32, K60 and K90, a rise the authors place close to the computed entanglement weight Mc of 46,620 g/mol. ··· They conclude that "it appears" two independent mechanisms set the LoC: below Mc, agglomeration of the drug-rich nanodroplets in the gel layer (Failure Mode I, newly described) gives a low LoC; above Mc, the LoC is set by phase inversion of the drug-rich phase (Failure Mode II). ·· Agglomeration was imaged only for K12 at 10% DL, and phase inversion only in K12 and K29/32 films, where it fell between 30 and 40% DL; for the other grades both modes are inferred. ···· Because K12 and K29/32 mixtures gave the same phase compositions, polymer molecular weight "does not appear" to shift phase inversion. ·· PVP did not slow droplet growth in dilute suspension, so steric stabilization is "not the likely mechanism"; the authors propose instead that entangled long chains "may be contributing" to droplet stability by holding few-hundred-nanometre droplets in a mesh of at most 80 nm and spacing them apart by swelling, a link that was not measured. ···· Failure Mode I came at lower loadings than Failure Mode II here, and the authors advise that formulation should consider both. ·
01Why this study
At low loading drug and polymer leave together, orders of magnitude faster than neat amorphous drug, and drug-rich nanodroplets form above the amorphous solubility.
Indulkar 2019, ref 8; Saboo 2019, ref 10; Ilevbare 2013, ref 11 ·
The LoC ranges from 5 to 40% DL; drug–polymer interactions and drug Tg lower it.
Above the LoC a continuous drug-rich phase forms in the gel layer and blocks release; this paper calls it Failure Mode II.
More detail
What was already known. The introduction builds on these points, most of them from the Taylor group:
- Why release mechanism matters. ASDs raise the release rate and bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. The prevailing view credits the higher solubility of the amorphous form, but recent evidence "suggests" ASD-specific release mechanisms that "may" add to it, so physically stable ASDs could differ in vivo. (He 2015, ref 1; Taylor 2016, ref 4; refs 5–7)
- Congruent, polymer-controlled release. At low DL drug and polymer release congruently, in the ASD proportion, at rates up to several orders of magnitude above neat amorphous drug and comparable to the neat polymer. In non-sink conditions release is fast and complete, and once the amorphous solubility is passed, drug-rich nanoparticles form by liquid–liquid phase separation. (Indulkar 2019, ref 8; Que 2019, ref 9; Saboo 2019, ref 10; Ilevbare 2013, ref 11) Such nanoparticles raised bioavailability (Kesisoglou 2019, ref 6), "possibly" through reservoir (Indulkar 2016, ref 12) and particle-drift effects (refs 13–14), so congruent release "may be the optimal release outcome". Drug-rich nanoparticles with a Tg below the experimental temperature are called nanodroplets.
- The cliff. Above the LoC release drops sharply toward that of neat amorphous drug ("falling-off-the-cliff"), in PVP, PVPVA and HPMC dispersions (refs 9, 15) and less so in HPMCAS (Yang 2021, ref 16); across systems the LoC ranges from 5 to 40% DL (refs 15–18). · Drug–polymer interactions (Que 2021, ref 18; Saboo 2020, ref 19) and drug Tg (Hiew 2022, ref 20) influence it.
- The gel layer. ASDs form a viscous surface gel layer in water (Deac 2023a, ref 21; Han 2019, ref 22), as polymers do on dissolution (refs 23–25), and the drug–water incompatibility inside it affects erosion and release.
- Failure Mode II. In copovidone ASDs of low-Tg drugs, size-stable nanodroplets form in the gel layer below the LoC and a continuous drug-rich matrix above it, which acts as a surface barrier (refs 21, 26, 27).
- Why molecular weight, and why clotrimazole. Molecular weight strongly shapes the gel layer and so "could have implications" for the LoC; PVP comes in many grades; clotrimazole does not interact strongly with PVP (Que 2020, ref 28), which removes interaction as a confounder, and it crystallizes slowly.
- Entanglement theory. Short or stiff chains cannot entangle; Mc ≈ 30C∞M0 estimates the threshold (Wool 1993, ref 30); entanglement also needs a polymer concentration above ce (Graessley 1980, ref 31); particles larger than the entanglement spacing dT are slowed by the network, smaller ones diffuse up to orders of magnitude faster (refs 32–33).
What the paper set out to do. Expand the list of known factors and failure modes that set the LoC, by testing how PVP molecular weight changes release and the phase behaviour at the ASD–solution interface. ·
02How they approached it
One drug that interacts weakly with PVP and crystallizes slowly, combined with six PVP grades from 2,500 to 1,300,000 g/mol, so that chain length is the main variable. Release at two or three loadings per grade locates the LoC; imaging and phase compositions then compare a short (K12) and a long (K29/32) grade. ····
What was done
Entanglement theory with C∞ = 14 and M0 = 111 g/mol→Mc, ce, tube diameter and Rg per grade (Table 1).·
100 mg compacts in 100 mL pH 8.0 buffer, 37 °C, non-sink→drug and PVP release over 90–120 min→LoC = highest DL with more than 80% drug released.···
Dye-labelled films at 100% RH, 37 °C→confocal images of the drug-rich (blue) and water-rich (red) phases after 1–11 h.··
Dye-labelled 10% DL compacts in buffer→confocal imaging of the dissolution front.·
ASD:water 40:60 at 90 °C, cooled→NMR composition of both phases.·
Droplets made by solvent injection, with and without 1 mg/mL PVP→DLS size over time.·
LoC against molecular weight, Mc and the film phase-inversion range (Fig. 7).
More detail
What was done
- ASDs. Clotrimazole and PVP were dissolved in ethanol and rotary-evaporated (70 °C bath, then 80 °C under vacuum for 5 min, dried overnight). K60, supplied as a 45% aqueous solution, was dried via a 1-propanol azeotrope, an 80 °C bath and a 120 °C oven overnight. Powders for imaging carried prodan (0.1 wt%, stains the drug-rich phase, shown blue) and Alexa Fluor 488 (0.003 wt%, stains the water-rich phase, shown red). ···
- Release. Powders were pressed (1500 psi, 1 min) into 0.5 cm² compacts held in a Woods die and rotated at 100 rpm in 100 mL pH 8.0, 50 mM phosphate buffer at 37 °C, where clotrimazole is "largely unionized". ASD compacts weighed 100 mg, so drug input far exceeded the amorphous solubility (non-sink). Drug was measured by HPLC after ethanol dilution dissolved the droplets; PVP by size-exclusion HPLC, or for K12 by an iodine colorimetric assay; n = 3. Release was called congruent when more than 80% of both drug and polymer released; the LoC is the highest DL whose drug release exceeded 80%. Tests ran 90 min (K12 to K29/32) or 120 min (K60, K90). ·····
- Films. About 5 µL of ethanol solution was dried on glass and stored over water (100% RH) at 37 °C; films were imaged by confocal microscopy after 1 h (20–40% DL) and after 3 and 11 h (10% DL). ·
- Compacts at the dissolution front. Dye-labelled 10% DL compacts were fused to a glass dish, covered and immersed in buffer at 37 °C; the edge was imaged every 30 s. The K12 compact was heat-fused (about 170 °C, 30 s), the K29/32 compact methanol-fused. ·
- Phase compositions. About 200 mg of 10% DL ASD was rotated with 300 µL buffer at 90 °C for 15 min, cooled and centrifuged at 37 °C; both phases were analysed by quantitative 1H NMR.
- Droplet stability. Clotrimazole in ethanol was injected into 37 °C medium without PVP or with 1 mg/mL K12 or K29/32 (polymer:drug 10:1), and droplet size was followed by DLS.
- Other. Tg of the PVP grades and of clotrimazole by DSC; clotrimazole amorphous solubility from the onset of light scattering on solvent injection. ·
Key equations
Chains shorter than Mc cannot entangle. With C∞ = 14 and M0 = 111 g/mol, Mc = 46,620 g/mol, which lies between K25 (34,000) and K29/32 (58,000).··
A polymer diluted by water or drug below ce disentangles. Table 1 gives 0.80, 0.12 and 0.04 v/v for K29/32, K60 and K90, so the longest chains stay entangled at much higher dilution.···
The spacing between entanglement points: 8.7 nm for undiluted PVP, with a segment length b of about 6 Å.·
The mesh opens on dilution up to a maximum at ce: 10, 36 and 80 nm for K29/32, K60 and K90, all far below the few-hundred-nanometre droplets. This is the basis of the "fishnet" argument.·
Radius of gyration of an unperturbed chain, from 1 nm (K12) to 27 nm (K90).··
Terms used on this page
- Congruent release: drug and polymer dissolve together, in the ASD's proportion; the release rate is then set by the polymer.
- Limit of congruency (LoC): the highest drug loading that still releases congruently; here, operationally, the highest loading releasing more than 80% of the drug.
- Gel layer: the hydrated, viscous surface layer of a dissolving ASD, between the glass–gel boundary (the dry glass turns rubbery) and the gel–solution boundary (polymer chains leave).
- Nanodroplet: a drug-rich nanoparticle whose Tg lies below the experimental temperature, so it is liquid-like.
- Segregative phase separation: water splits the system into a drug-rich phase and a polymer-rich water phase, the polymer avoiding the drug.
- Phase inversion: the drug-rich phase changes from dispersed droplets to the continuous phase, with water-rich droplets inside it.
- Entanglement: long, overlapping chains knot into a transient network; Mc and ce are the minimum chain length and concentration for it, dT its mesh size.
- Failure Mode I (new here): drug-rich droplets agglomerate in the gel layer and stay behind. Failure Mode II: phase inversion makes the drug-rich phase a continuous surface barrier.
03Main findings
The LoC jumps with PVP molecular weight, then levels off
The LoC was below 5% DL for K12 and K17, 20% for K25, and about 33, 35 and 38% for K29/32, K60 and K90. The jump lies close to the computed entanglement weight Mc of 46,620 g/mol. ···
See also Fig. 7
More detail
The LoC is given here as the last tested loading that released more than 80% of the drug; the next tested loading is the first that failed. ·
- K12, 5% DL. PVP released fully (about 107%), but drug release stopped at about 35%: incongruent already at the lowest loading tested. ·
- K17, 5% DL. PVP about 101–103%, drug about 74–77%, below the 80% line. ·
- K25. At 20% DL drug reached about 86–88% and PVP about 103%; at 23% DL drug stopped at about 58% (large scatter, SD about ±23) while PVP reached about 91%. LoC 20%. ·
- K29/32. At 30% DL drug and PVP both reached about 87–93%; at 33% DL drug peaked at about 82% (50 min) and ended at about 77% (90 min) while PVP reached about 103%; at 35% DL both released slowly, about 64% drug and 73% PVP at 90 min. LoC about 33%. ·
- K60. At 35% DL drug reached about 96% and PVP about 101% by 90 min; at 38% DL drug levelled at about 69–73% and PVP at about 86–87%. LoC 35%.
- K90. At 38% DL release was slow but reached about 83% drug and 96% PVP at 120 min; at 40% DL about 64% and 70%, and at 45% DL about 50% and 72% at 120 min, both still rising. LoC about 38%. ·
In the authors' words, incongruent release appeared at ≥5% DL for K12 and K17, ≥23% for K25, ≥35% for K29/32 and ≥45% for K90; variability made it hard to detect at 35% K29/32, 38% K60 and 40% K90, which is why they used the 80% drug criterion. ·· Fig. 7 plots these LoCs against molecular weight: below 5% for the two shortest grades, 20% for K25, then about 32.5–37.5% for the three long grades (bar readings), with the Mc line between K25 and K29/32. The authors call the effect "surprising": a rapid rise to over 30% across a narrow molecular-weight threshold close to Mc, with little gain above it. K25 sits in between (20%), so the rise spans K17 to K29/32 rather than a single step. In every test the apparent drug concentration exceeded the amorphous solubility and the medium turned turbid, which the authors read as droplet formation. ·
In humid films, drug-rich droplets cluster into strands with K12 but not with K29/32
At 10% DL and 100% RH both films formed drug-rich droplets in a continuous water-rich phase by 3 h. By 11 h the K12 droplets had clustered into strands; the K29/32 droplets stayed separate.
More detail
Before exposure both films were uniformly magenta, so drug and polymer were mixed. · After 3 h at 100% RH and 37 °C both separated into blue drug-rich droplets in a continuous red water/polymer-rich phase. After 11 h the droplets in both films were larger; in the K12 film groups of touching droplets formed strands (outlined in yellow in Fig. 3b), which the authors describe as extensive agglomeration, whereas the K29/32 droplets stayed individually dispersed (Fig. 3d). The authors call this agglomeration "likely the mechanism behind the poor release" of the K12 system and name it Failure Mode I. The release of K12 was, however, measured at 5% DL, not at the 10% imaged.
At the dissolution front, K12 droplets agglomerate and stay behind; K29/32 droplets leave
In a 10% DL K12 compact the droplets formed a connected network near the gel–solution boundary within 2 min and did not leave the gel layer. In a 10% DL K29/32 compact no agglomeration was seen after more than 7 min. ·
More detail
Water entered the compact rapidly and formed a gel layer in which the dyes separated, marking phase separation (Fig. 5: region 1 dry ASD, 2 gel layer, 3 solution). · In the K12 compact the droplets were dispersed at first but, beyond a point in the gel layer close to the gel–solution boundary, formed a strand-like interconnected network, with denser agglomerates nearest the solution; the droplets accumulated at the interface instead of releasing, and this continued over time. The authors' reading: as the water-rich phase around the network was diluted and the polymer diffused out, the network collapsed; it was anchored in the gel and strong enough to resist the flow, so the droplets were held back, giving a low LoC. In the K29/32 compact no agglomeration was seen in the gel layer or among the droplets released into solution. The two compacts were fused to the glass differently and imaged at different times.
Phase inversion happens between 30 and 40% DL for both grades
After 1 h at 100% RH, films held drug-rich droplets up to 30% DL and a continuous drug-rich phase with water-rich droplets at 40% DL, for both K12 and K29/32. ·
More detail
K12 films at 20 and 30% DL and K29/32 films at 30% DL showed the drug-rich (blue) phase as dispersed domains; at 40% DL both grades showed a continuous blue phase holding red water-rich droplets (Fig. 4). The authors identify this as phase inversion, a known failure mode in other systems, and name it Failure Mode II. · The K12 domains at 30% DL were several micrometres across and many touched, much coarser than the small K29/32 droplets at the same loading; no loading between 30 and 40% was imaged. ·· For K12 the authors note both modes: Failure Mode I limits release already below 5% DL and Failure Mode II appears between 30 and 40% DL, so preventing agglomeration would leave the LoC set by phase inversion.
Molecular weight does not change the phase compositions
At ASD:water 40:60 the drug-rich phase held about 83–84 wt% clotrimazole and the water-rich phase about 39–41 wt% PVP and 59–61 wt% water, with only a trace of drug, for both K12 and K29/32. ·
More detail
Fig. 6 gives the two phases of 10% DL K12 and K29/32 mixtures (n = 4): drug-rich phase about 83 ± 5.5 vs 84 ± 2.5 wt% clotrimazole, 9 ± 2 vs 6.5 ± 1 wt% PVP and 10.5 ± 3 vs 9.5 ± 1.5 wt% water; water-rich phase about 41 vs 39 wt% PVP and 59 vs 61 wt% water. The authors call the compositions "statistically" similar and conclude that molecular weight had no significant effect on the thermodynamics of the system; PVP segregates from clotrimazole (segregative separation), which they describe as typical of weakly interacting pairs. ·· From this they argue that phase inversion should occur at the same loading for both grades, as the films showed. No statistical test is named, and the mixtures were heated to 90 °C before analysis. ·
PVP does not stabilise the droplets in dilute suspension
Droplets grew from about 540 nm to 1 µm without PVP, from about 340 to 610 nm with K12 and from about 290 to 630 nm with K29/32, at the same relative rate. ·
More detail
The droplets started smaller with PVP present, but the starting size did not depend on the grade, and the normalized growth was the same in all three media, even at a polymer-to-drug ratio of 10:1. The authors conclude that clotrimazole nanodroplets are unstable and that PVP is not a good stabilizer in dilute suspension. · This is their main argument against steric stabilization by adsorbed PVP as the reason K29/32 droplets stay dispersed in the gel layer.
04Further observations
- PVP Tg rose from 101.5 °C (K12) to 177–178 °C (K29/32, K90). ···
- Higher-MW PVP released more slowly, both neat and in congruent ASDs. ··
- Clotrimazole: Tg 28.0 °C, amorphous solubility 10.3 µg/mL at pH 8.0.
- Compact images show a sharp glass–gel boundary and a gel–solution boundary where the red signal ends. ·
More detail
- Glass transition of the grades. Tg rose from 101.5 ± 3.1 °C (K12) to 127.0 ± 2.2 °C (K17) and 177.3 ± 0.9 °C (K29/32), then stayed at 178.1 ± 0.1 °C (K90); K25 and K60 were not reported. The authors describe an initial rise followed by a plateau. ····
- Release rate and molecular weight. Neat PVP compacts released more slowly as molecular weight increased (Fig. S5, not supplied), and congruently releasing ASDs followed the same trend for both drug and polymer; the authors take this as a sign that release is polymer-controlled, the ASD releasing like a neat glassy polymer. ··· The ASD comparisons are at different loadings (20% K25, 30% K29/32, 35% K60, 38% K90).
- Calculated chain properties. Only K29/32, K60 and K90 exceed Mc; their ce values (0.80, 0.12, 0.04 v/v) mean K90 stays entangled even at 4% polymer by volume while K29/32 disentangles below 80%. Rg ranges from 1 nm (K12) to 27 nm (K90). ····
- Drug properties. Clotrimazole melts at 141.2 °C, has a Tg of 28.0 °C and an amorphous solubility of 10.3 ± 0.6 µg/mL in pH 8.0 buffer; calculated pKa 6.26 and logP 5.84.
- Interface boundaries. In the compact images the glass–gel boundary appears as a sharp colour change between dry ASD and gel, and the gel–solution boundary where the red dye signal falls to background; the authors place polymer release, and with it droplet release, at the gel–solution boundary. ···
05How the authors connect the findings
More detail
- On contact with buffer, water penetrates the glass and turns it into a rubbery gel layer with concentration and viscosity gradients; water ingress opens a miscibility gap, and the gel splits into a drug-rich hydrophobic phase (about 83 wt% drug in the 40:60 mixtures) and a water-rich phase holding most of the PVP. ···
- The gel is viscous because the chains overlap and, for K29/32 and longer, entangle. Droplets are held in it until the polymer is dilute enough to leave at the gel–solution boundary; then droplets and polymer leave together, even under non-sink conditions. Release is then limited by water penetration and polymer release, which is why higher grades release more slowly. ··
Below Mc. The chains are too short to entangle and form no "fishnet", so the droplets can move and meet. They agglomerate into strings near the gel–solution boundary; the network is anchored in the gel and strong enough to resist the flow, and it collapses into dense agglomerates as the surrounding phase is diluted and the polymer leaves. The drug stays behind while the polymer releases: incongruent release at low loading (K12 and K17 already at 5%; K25 at 23%). The authors say the low LoC "appears to be caused" by this agglomeration. ····
Above Mc, below inversion. Entangled chains raise viscosity sharply. Molecules smaller than the mesh (water, single drug molecules) move freely, but droplets much larger than the mesh are held back; the mesh is at most 80 nm (K90 at ce), the droplets a few hundred nanometres. Entangled gels also swell more, which "is expected to" push the droplets apart, so that when the chains finally disentangle the droplets are too far apart to agglomerate at once. The authors present this as a hypothesis that the coincidence with Mc "gives support to". ·
Above the phase-inversion loading. As loading rises the drug-rich phase takes up more volume until it becomes continuous; such a phase cannot leave the viscous gel and blocks further water entry. Since K12 and K29/32 had the same phase compositions and inverted between 30 and 40% DL, molecular weight "does not appear" to influence this. ··
What sets the switch point. Steric stabilization by adsorbed PVP was considered and set aside ("not the likely mechanism"), because PVP did not slow droplet growth in dilute suspension. The authors' candidate is chain entanglement: K29/32 is expected to disentangle below 0.8 v/v, which in their view explains why it gave no stabilization in dilute solution. Below Mc the LoC is set by agglomeration, above Mc by the inversion loading (the LoC of K29/32, and "possibly" of K60 and K90). ···
Conclusion drawn. "It appears that there are two independent mechanisms" behind the LoC, and Failure Mode I occurs at lower loadings than Failure Mode II, which is "conceptually expected" because above the inversion loading no droplets form. Theoretical considerations "suggest" that entangled chains stabilize the droplets by hindering their diffusion and spacing them through swelling. ··· The exact mechanism "has not been fully elucidated".
06What it means for formulation
- Consider both failure modes: raising the phase-inversion loading with another polymer or additive may expose Failure Mode I.
- Low-MW polymer speeds release but can trigger Failure Mode I; smaller droplets may be less stable.
- For PVP ASDs of weakly interacting, low-Tg drugs, a grade above the entanglement weight (K29/32 or higher) was needed here to reach loadings above 20%.
More detail
- Formulation should consider both mechanisms: if a different polymer or additive raised the loading at which phase inversion occurs, the system "may" become limited by Failure Mode I instead.
- To prevent Failure Mode I, avoid what promotes agglomeration, even where this runs against accepted practice: smaller droplets, usually sought for bioavailability, can be less stable; low-MW polymer gives faster release but can trigger Failure Mode I.
- Surfactants can lower Tg and physical stability but can also stabilize droplets and "may prevent" Failure Mode I; partly ionized droplet surfaces are more stable, so drug pKa and medium pH matter.
- Failure Mode II "will always occur" in unionized conditions as loading rises; it is driven by drug–polymer–water thermodynamics, so polymer and additive chemistry should be screened against it; strong drug–polymer interactions, good for storage stability, lower its loading, so the system has to be balanced.
- Identifying the mechanism behind an LoC is needed to raise loading limits and bioavailability.
- Polymer grade is a formulation variable in its own right: in this system the LoC changed from below 5% to about 38% with grade alone, so an LoC found with one grade should not be assumed for another grade of the same polymer.
- A long-chain grade buys loading at the cost of release rate: the K90 dispersions released more slowly than the K25 or K29/32 ones.
- The LoCs of the entangling grades already lie inside the phase-inversion window, so further gains in this system would need a change in thermodynamics (polymer chemistry, additives), not a longer chain.
07Open questions
- What exactly stops droplet agglomeration in high-MW PVP gels?
- Agglomeration and phase inversion were imaged for K12 and K29/32 only; the other grades are inferred. ·
- Entanglement in the gel layer, droplet diffusion and gel swelling were not measured.
More detail
- The exact mechanism behind the effect of high molecular weight on droplet agglomeration "has not been fully elucidated"; entanglement and swelling are offered as hypotheses. ··
- Whether surfactants, partial ionization or other polymers can prevent Failure Mode I, or move Failure Mode II, is posed as a design consideration, not tested. ··
- Failure Mode I was seen only for K12 at 10% DL, while K12 release was measured at 5% DL; K17 and K25 were not imaged. ·
- Phase inversion was imaged only at 30 and 40% DL and only for K12 and K29/32. ·
- Whether K29/32 chains are entangled where the droplets sit in the gel layer is not shown; the mesh sizes are calculated, and no viscosity, diffusion or gel thickness was measured.
- Each LoC is bracketed by two tested loadings, and the 80% criterion was applied over 90- or 120-min tests, with some profiles still rising. ·
- Only one drug, one pH (8.0, unionized drug) and one polymer family were tested; whether surface crystallization contributed to any poor release is not reported.
08How solid
AI assessment, not a statement made in the paperThe release data across six grades show the molecular-weight effect on the LoC directly. The assignment of failure modes rests on qualitative images of two grades at selected loadings, and the entanglement mechanism is a hypothesis without direct data. ···
More detail
- Release of drug and polymer was measured with n = 3 for twelve grade–loading combinations, and the jump in LoC from the short to the long grades is large compared with the scatter. ·
- The contrast between K12 and K29/32 droplets is seen in two independent set-ups, humid films and compacts in buffer. ·
- The phase compositions of K12 and K29/32 mixtures overlap, and their films invert in the same loading window. ·
- The entanglement numbers of Table 1 reproduce from the printed equations. ···
- Failure Mode I was imaged only for K12 (at 10% DL, release at 5%); for K17 and K25 it is inferred, as is phase inversion for K17, K25, K60 and K90. ··
- The LoC values are bracketed by coarse loading steps, read from a bar chart, and depend on an unstated time point within 90- or 120-min tests. ·
- The "narrow threshold" near Mc includes K25 at an intermediate 20%.
- The entanglement "fishnet" is not measured, and K29/32 needs at least 0.80 v/v polymer to entangle.
- Imaging used one compact per grade, prepared differently; the replicate number and statistics of the phase compositions are unclear; Fig. 6 mislabels the polymer; crystal checks of the failed compacts are not reported. ····
09Figure guide
Every figure and table of the paper, what it is there for, and what to check on the original. Key figures are shown with the story.
| Figure | What it does in the paper | Supports | Check (AI note) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fig. 1 (p.2)key figure | Defines the systems: clotrimazole and the PVP repeat unit.· | 0.2 | |
| Table 1 (p.3)key figure | Grade properties and entanglement estimates that place Mc between K25 and K29/32.· | 0.2, F1 | Rg is listed for all grades though the text names three; b is printed as 6 nm on p.5.· |
| Fig. 2 (p.5)key figure | The core release data: drug and PVP release for twelve grade–loading pairs against the 80% line. | F1, K1 | No time point stated for the 80% criterion; some profiles still rising at the end. |
| Fig. 3 (p.6)key figure | Humid films at 10% DL: droplets cluster into strands with K12, not with K29/32. | F2, K2 | Imaged at 10% DL; K12 release tested at 5% DL. |
| Fig. 4 (p.7)key figure | Phase inversion between 30 and 40% DL in films of both grades. | F4, K3 | K12 structure at 30% DL coarser than K29/32; only 30 and 40% imaged. |
| Fig. 5 (p.7)key figure | Dissolution front: agglomerated droplet network with K12, none with K29/32. | F3, K2 | Compacts prepared differently, imaged at 2 versus >7 min. |
| Fig. 6 (p.8)key figure | Same phase compositions for K12 and K29/32 at 40:60, used to argue the same inversion loading. | F5, K4 | Axis says PVPVA; n = 4 versus triplicate in the methods.· |
| Fig. 7 (p.9)key figure | Summary: LoC versus molecular weight, with Mc and the phase-inversion band. | F1, K1, K3 | Bars read about 0.5% below the tested loadings; inversion band inferred for four grades.· |
| Figs. S1, S4 (SI, not supplied) | Uniform dye distribution in compacts and films before exposure.· | F2 | |
| Figs. S2, S3 (SI, not supplied) | Time series of the K12 dissolution front and of droplets released from K29/32. | F3 | |
| Fig. S5 (SI, not supplied) | Neat PVP release slows with molecular weight. | 0.4 | |
| Fig. S6 (SI, not supplied) | DLS droplet growth with and without PVP. | F6, K5 | |
| Figs. S7, S8 (SI, not supplied) | Schematics of the gel-layer gradients and of the entanglement "fishnet".· | 0.5 | A schematic, not data. |